Transport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v. Bianco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Transport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v. Bianco

130 A.D.3d 507, 11 N.Y.S.3d 859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 2015

Docket15696 652798/13

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.3d 507 (Transport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v. Bianco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Transport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v. Bianco, 130 A.D.3d 507, 11 N.Y.S.3d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered September 2, 2014, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed plaintiff union’s complaint alleging that the collective bargaining agreement provision setting forth procedures for predisciplinary suspensions was void under Civil Service Law § 75. “Rights under Civil Service Law § 75 may be supplemented, modified or replaced by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement” (Matter of Patel v New York City Hous. Auth., 26 AD3d 172, 174 [1st Dept 2006]), which is the case here with respect to disciplinary grievance procedures set forth under the Civil Service Law, including those concerning predisciplinary suspensions (see Matter of Robinson v New York City Tr. Auth., 226 AD2d 467, 468 [2d Dept 1996]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered September 2, 2014, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed plaintiff union’s complaint alleging that the collective bargaining agreement provision setting forth procedures for predisciplinary suspensions was void under Civil Service Law § 75. “Rights under Civil Service Law § 75 may be supplemented, modified or replaced by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement” (Matter of Patel v New York City Hous. Auth., 26 AD3d 172, 174 [1st Dept 2006]), which is the case here with respect to disciplinary grievance procedures set forth under the Civil Service Law, including those concerning predisciplinary suspensions (see Matter of Robinson v New York City Tr. Auth., 226 AD2d 467, 468 [2d Dept 1996]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.3d 507, 11 N.Y.S.3d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transport-workers-union-of-greater-ny-v-bianco-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack