Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority

216 A.D.2d 400, 628 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 400 (Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority, 216 A.D.2d 400, 628 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, [401]*401Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 20, 1993, which dismissed the petition and granted the respondent’s cross application to confirm the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly held that the award of the Arbitration Board was not totally irrational (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308). In addition, the award did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623, 630-631; see also, Skinner v Railway Labor Executives Assn., 489 US 602). Mangano, P. J., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, [401]*401Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated December 20, 1993, which dismissed the petition and granted the respondent’s cross application to confirm the award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly held that the award of the Arbitration Board was not totally irrational (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308). In addition, the award did not violate public policy (see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623, 630-631; see also, Skinner v Railway Labor Executives Assn., 489 US 602). Mangano, P. J., Joy, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 400, 628 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transport-workers-union-of-america-local-100-v-new-york-city-transit-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack