Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. v. Rhodes

375 S.W.3d 258, 2012 WL 3656511, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1055
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. WD 74559·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. (“Transport”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) affirming the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal’s (“Appeals Tribunal”) decision to grant Clarence Rhodes unemployment benefits. In its two points on appeal, Transport claims that the Commission erred in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal because (1) the facts found by the Commission establish, as a matter of law, that Rhodes’s employment terminated by reason of his voluntary departure from employment within the meaning of section 288.050.1(1), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2011, in that his action by failing to timely return his medical certification led to his unemployment and cannot be found to have been excused by his non-work-related illness, and alternatively (2) because Rhodes’s actions constitute misconduct under section 288.050.2, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2011, in that Rhodes showed intentional and substantial disregard with respect to his obligation to timely return his medical certification forms to Transport. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. v. Rhodes, 375 S.W.3d 258, 2012 WL 3656511, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1055 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

375 S.W.3d 258 (Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.