Transource Pennsylvania, LLC v. DeFrank

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 26, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-01101
StatusUnknown

This text of Transource Pennsylvania, LLC v. DeFrank (Transource Pennsylvania, LLC v. DeFrank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Transource Pennsylvania, LLC v. DeFrank, (M.D. Pa. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TRANSOURCE PENNSYLVANIA, : Civil No. 1:21-CV-01101 LLC, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : GLADYS BROWN DUTRIEUILLE, et : al., : : Defendants. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson ORDER AND NOW, on this 26th day of August, 2021, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, Doc. 57, will be DENIED in part with respect to Defendants’ arguments that Transource lacks standing. The court defers ruling on the remainder of the motion. 2. Having determined that the court has jurisdiction over this lawsuit, in the exercise of its discretion, the court will abstain from exercising its jurisdiction until final resolution of the parallel Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court proceeding at docket number 689 CD 2021 in accordance with Wilton v. Seven Falls Co., 515 U.S. 277, 290 (1995); Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Co., 316 U.S. 491, 495 (1942); and Reifer v. Westport Ins. Corp., 751 F.3d 129, 139 (3d Cir. 2014). 3. This case is stayed at least until the final resolution of this parallel proceeding. 4. The parties shall notify the court once there is a final ruling on the merits of the Commonwealth Court case. The parties shall advise the court, in

light of the Commonwealth Court’s ruling, whether either party wishes to lift the stay and proceed with this case, and whether there are ongoing proceedings pending in Pennsylvania state court.

5. The court defers ruling on the remainder of the issues presented in the pending motions until such notice is received. (Docs. 20, 21, 40, 57.) s/Jennifer P. Wilson JENNIFER P. WILSON United States District Court Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America
316 U.S. 491 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.
515 U.S. 277 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Rox-Ann Reifer v. Westport Insurance Corp
751 F.3d 129 (Third Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Transource Pennsylvania, LLC v. DeFrank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transource-pennsylvania-llc-v-defrank-pamd-2021.