Transonic Corporation v. E. Edelmann & Company

386 F.2d 996, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4155
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 15, 1967·No. 24707_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The crucial question presented on this appeal is identical to that tried in the District Court, to wit: Did appellant Transonic Corporation, by and through E. N. Amos, its Vice President, execute *997 a valid and enforceable guaranty in favor of appellee, Edelmann & Company, rendering appellant and Amos jointly and severally liable to appellee for goods sold in the sum of $12,661.85 advanced by ap-pellee on open account to one of appellant’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Trans-co Southern?

After thoroughly scrutinizing the record as a whole, we agree that the findings of the District Court reported in Edel-mann & Company v. Transonic Corporation, 277 F.Supp. 105 (N.D.Ga.1967), are not clearly erroneous, F.R.Civ.P. 52 (a), and that the authorities cited therein were governing and correctly applied. In accordance with these views, we affirm the judgment rendered by the District Court on February 7, 1967, awarding judgment to Edelmann, in the above amount with interest thereon from November 7, 1963.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transonic Corporation v. E. Edelmann & Company, 386 F.2d 996, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4155 (5th Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 996 (Transonic Corporation v. E. Edelmann & Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falls at Naples, Ltd. v. Barnett Bank of Naples, N.A.
603 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)