Translateur v. United States Lines Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Translateur v. United States Lines Co.

179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 13, 1943·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff under the evidence was not entitled to recover as the law of the place where the contract was made was impliedly a part thereof and controlled and limited the rights of the parties thereunder.

On plaintiff’s appeal judgment as amended dismissing first cause of action affirmed. On defendant’s appeal said judgment for plaintiff on the second cause of action reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the second cause of action dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff under the evidence was not entitled to recover as the law of the place where the contract was made was impliedly a part thereof and controlled and limited the rights of the parties thereunder.

On plaintiff’s appeal judgment as amended dismissing first cause of action affirmed. On defendant’s appeal said judgment for plaintiff on the second cause of action reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the second cause of action dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Translateur v. United States Lines Co., 179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

179 Misc. 843 (Translateur v. United States Lines Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related