Translateur v. United States Lines Co.
This text of 179 Misc. 843 (Translateur v. United States Lines Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff under the evidence was not entitled to recover as the law of the place where the contract was made was impliedly a part thereof and controlled and limited the rights of the parties thereunder.
On plaintiff’s appeal judgment as amended dismissing first cause of action affirmed. On defendant’s appeal said judgment for plaintiff on the second cause of action reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the second cause of action dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/translateur-v-united-states-lines-co-nyappterm-1943.