Translateur v. United States Lines Co.

179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 Misc. 843 (Translateur v. United States Lines Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Translateur v. United States Lines Co., 179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff under the evidence was not entitled to recover as the law of the place where the contract was made was impliedly a part thereof and controlled and limited the rights of the parties thereunder.

On plaintiff’s appeal judgment as amended dismissing first cause of action affirmed. On defendant’s appeal said judgment for plaintiff on the second cause of action reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the second cause of action dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eck v. N. V. Nederlandsch Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij
183 Misc. 691 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 Misc. 843, 42 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/translateur-v-united-states-lines-co-nyappterm-1943.