Transamerica Insurance v. 615 Co.

208 A.D.2d 461, 618 N.Y.S.2d 217

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about February 22, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court correctly framed the issue to be "whether the damage is to tenant’s property or to fixtures”, and correctly found such to be an issue of fact (Matter of Dormitory Auth. [Milo Press] 172 AD2d 401) that precludes a summary determination of whether the waiver of subrogation clause is applicable (see, Continental Ins. Co. v Faron Engraving Co., 179 AD2d 360; Viacom Intl. v Midtown Realty Co., 193 AD2d 45, 54). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Asch, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transamerica Insurance v. 615 Co., 208 A.D.2d 461, 618 N.Y.S.2d 217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 461 (Transamerica Insurance v. 615 Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Dormitory Authority
172 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Continental Insurance v. Faron Engraving Co.
179 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Viacom International, Inc. v. Midtown Realty Co.
193 A.D.2d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)