Trans-Lux Midwest Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. Circuit

Trans-Lux Midwest Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

53 F. App'x 571

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 26, 2002

DocketNos. 01-1434, 02-1274

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 571 (Trans-Lux Midwest Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trans-Lux Midwest Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 53 F. App'x 571 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER curiam:.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED and the cross-application for enforcement be GRANTED. The Board’s conclusion that Trans-Lux did not have a good faith reasonable doubt about the majority status of the Union is based upon substantial evidence in the record. See Trans-Lux Midwest Corporation and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 347, 335 NLRB No. 22 (2001).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER curiam:.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED and the cross-application for enforcement be GRANTED. The Board’s conclusion that Trans-Lux did not have a good faith reasonable doubt about the majority status of the Union is based upon substantial evidence in the record. See Trans-Lux Midwest Corporation and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 347, 335 NLRB No. 22 (2001).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F. App'x 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trans-lux-midwest-corp-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-2002.