Trans-Country Van Lines, Inc. v. Kronick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Trans-Country Van Lines, Inc. v. Kronick

497 So. 2d 923, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10966

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 1986

DocketNo. 86-14

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 497 So. 2d 923 (Trans-Country Van Lines, Inc. v. Kronick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trans-Country Van Lines, Inc. v. Kronick, 497 So. 2d 923, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10966 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment which awarded the Kronicks $2,304.00 in actual damages and $900.00 for expenses they necessarily incurred when appellant breached its contract with them by failing to deliver appellees’ furniture, clothing and other household possessions on or before an agreed date, and by failing to honestly inform them as to the location and status of their shipment of goods. The appellees’ motel expenses, food costs, telephone bills and purchase of minimal clothing were damages flowing from appellant’s wrongs, and we think they may be considered gen[924]*924eral damages. See Hutchison v. Tompkins, 259 So.2d 129 (Fla.1972); Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Batchis, 54 Fla. 192, 44 So. 933 (1907); 17 Fla.Jur.2d (1980) § 32 at 37.

However, we must reverse the award of attorney’s fees to appellees. The award was based on section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1985). That section provides:

The court shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party in any civil action in which the court finds that there was a complete absence of a justi-ciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party. (Emphasis added).

In this case we cannot agree that appellant’s position in this-lawsuit was so devoid of merit as to be frivolous. Wright v. Acierno, 437 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Merely losing is insufficient to invoke the operation of this section. Allen v. Dutton’s Estate, 384 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 392 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1980).

The trial court also buttressed its attorney’s fee award by finding “intentional misconduct” on the part of appellant. The trial court made no express punitive damage nor tort damage award in this case, although appellees sought such awards. Although intentional misconduct may serve as a basis for punitive damages or tort damages, it does not support an attorney’s fee award.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur. COBB, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment which awarded the Kronicks $2,304.00 in actual damages and $900.00 for expenses they necessarily incurred when appellant breached its contract with them by failing to deliver appellees’ furniture, clothing and other household possessions on or before an agreed date, and by failing to honestly inform them as to the location and status of their shipment of goods. The appellees’ motel expenses, food costs, telephone bills and purchase of minimal clothing were damages flowing from appellant’s wrongs, and we think they may be considered gen[924]*924eral damages. See Hutchison v. Tompkins, 259 So.2d 129 (Fla.1972); Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Batchis, 54 Fla. 192, 44 So. 933 (1907); 17 Fla.Jur.2d (1980) § 32 at 37.

However, we must reverse the award of attorney’s fees to appellees. The award was based on section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1985). That section provides:

The court shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party in any civil action in which the court finds that there was a complete absence of a justi-ciable issue of either law or fact raised by the losing party. (Emphasis added).

In this case we cannot agree that appellant’s position in this-lawsuit was so devoid of merit as to be frivolous. Wright v. Acierno, 437 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Merely losing is insufficient to invoke the operation of this section. Allen v. Dutton’s Estate, 384 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 392 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1980).

The trial court also buttressed its attorney’s fee award by finding “intentional misconduct” on the part of appellant. The trial court made no express punitive damage nor tort damage award in this case, although appellees sought such awards. Although intentional misconduct may serve as a basis for punitive damages or tort damages, it does not support an attorney’s fee award.

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur. COBB, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 923, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trans-country-van-lines-inc-v-kronick-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack