TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 15, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D20-1669
Lower Tribunal No. 18-9086
Trandworld, Inc.,
Petitioner,
vs.
Justin Rubin, et al.,
Respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Martin Zilber, Judge.
Tirado-Luciano & Tirado, and Monica Tirado and Alex Tirado-Luciano, for petitioner.
Siegfried Rivera, and B. Michael Clark, Jr., for respondents.
Before LINDSEY, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our previous opinion and issue this opinion in its place.
The petition for certiorari is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner seeking appellate review of the denial of its motion for relief and the order imposing sanctions once a final order has been entered. See, e.g., Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So. 2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) (“[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court’s certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal.”).
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN (TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.