TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 2021·No. 20-1669·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 15, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-1669

Lower Tribunal No. 18-9086

Trandworld, Inc.,

Petitioner,

vs.

Justin Rubin, et al.,

Respondents.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Martin Zilber, Judge.

Tirado-Luciano & Tirado, and Monica Tirado and Alex Tirado-Luciano, for petitioner.

Siegfried Rivera, and B. Michael Clark, Jr., for respondents.

Before LINDSEY, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our previous opinion and issue this opinion in its place.

The petition for certiorari is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner seeking appellate review of the denial of its motion for relief and the order imposing sanctions once a final order has been entered. See, e.g., Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So. 2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) (“[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court’s certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal.”).

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN (TRANDWORLD, INC. v. JUSTIN RUBIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.
720 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)