Trampert v. Trampert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trampert v. Trampert

55 A.D.2d 838, 390 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 838 (Trampert v. Trampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trampert v. Trampert, 55 A.D.2d 838, 390 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court in accordance with the following memorandum: Inasmuch as the infants involved in this proceeding are now physically present in the State, Family Court has personal jurisdiction and may rule on the matter of custody (see Matter of Lang v Lang, 9 AD2d 401, 406, affd 7 NY2d 1029; Matter of Bachman v Mejias, 1 NY2d 575, 580-581; and cf. Ryan v Ryan, 24 AD2d 531). It was error, however, for the court to change its prior order of custody in the mother and award custody to the father without a hearing to determine whether circumstances had so changed since the entry of its prior order that the best interests of the children required a modification (Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768; Skakun v Skakun, 11 AD2d 724). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—custody.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court in accordance with the following memorandum: Inasmuch as the infants involved in this proceeding are now physically present in the State, Family Court has personal jurisdiction and may rule on the matter of custody (see Matter of Lang v Lang, 9 AD2d 401, 406, affd 7 NY2d 1029; Matter of Bachman v Mejias, 1 NY2d 575, 580-581; and cf. Ryan v Ryan, 24 AD2d 531). It was error, however, for the court to change its prior order of custody in the mother and award custody to the father without a hearing to determine whether circumstances had so changed since the entry of its prior order that the best interests of the children required a modification (Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768; Skakun v Skakun, 11 AD2d 724). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—custody.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 838, 390 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trampert-v-trampert-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack