Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Trammelle v. State

Trammelle v. State

601 So. 2d 1339, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8195, 1992 WL 162295
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1242
StatusPublished

This text of 601 So. 2d 1339 (Trammelle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trammelle v. State, 601 So. 2d 1339, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8195, 1992 WL 162295 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's pro se motion to withdraw his plea was abandoned with the filing of his notice of appeal, In re Forfeiture of $104,591 in U.S. Currency, 589 So.2d 283 (Fla.1991). His allegation of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be raised in a proper petition for writ of habe-as corpus.

The judgement and sentence are AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file in the trial court a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

SHIVERS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Forfeiture of $104,591 in US Currency
589 So. 2d 283 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 1339, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8195, 1992 WL 162295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trammelle-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.