Trammelle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Trammelle v. State

601 So. 2d 1339, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8195, 1992 WL 162295

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1992·No. No. 91-1242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's pro se motion to withdraw his plea was abandoned with the filing of his notice of appeal, In re Forfeiture of $104,591 in U.S. Currency, 589 So.2d 283 (Fla.1991). His allegation of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be raised in a proper petition for writ of habe-as corpus.

The judgement and sentence are AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file in the trial court a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

SHIVERS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's pro se motion to withdraw his plea was abandoned with the filing of his notice of appeal, In re Forfeiture of $104,591 in U.S. Currency, 589 So.2d 283 (Fla.1991). His allegation of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be raised in a proper petition for writ of habe-as corpus.

The judgement and sentence are AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s right to file in the trial court a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

SHIVERS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Trammelle v. State, 601 So. 2d 1339, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8195, 1992 WL 162295 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

601 So. 2d 1339 (Trammelle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related