Trammell v. State

301 S.W.3d 601, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, 2010 WL 354936
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Trammell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 241
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 2010·No. WD 70660·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

David Trammell appeals the Jackson County Circuit Court’s (motion court) denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, he presents one point in which he claims that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing because, in his motion, he claims to have alleged facts which were not refuted by the record, establishing that his counsel incorrectly informed him that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole would credit the time he served in the Kansas Department of Corrections on unrelated charges from the State of Kansas. Because the record *602 from the plea and sentencing hearing reflects otherwise, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trammell v. State, 301 S.W.3d 601, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, 2010 WL 354936 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

301 S.W.3d 601 (Trammell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.