Trammell v. Showell Farms

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Trammell v. Showell Farms

613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2188, 1993 WL 39594

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1410

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 147 (Trammell v. Showell Farms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trammell v. Showell Farms, 613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2188, 1993 WL 39594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for remand, the Judge of Compensation Claims shows that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. Under these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for remand, the Judge of Compensation Claims shows that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. Under these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2188, 1993 WL 39594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trammell-v-showell-farms-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack