Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Co.

328 So. 2d 868, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1976·No. No. 75-1076·Published

Opinion

CROSS, Judge.

Appellant, Samuel J. Trammel, seeks review of a final judgment entered in favor [869]*869of appellees, Larry Frady Crane Service and Reliance Insurance Company, in an action seeking damages for personal injuries sustained by the appellant as a result of alleged negligence in the operation of a crane.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we determine that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that assumption of risk was a complete bar to recovery in a negligence action. The assumption of risk doctrine has been completely abrogated by the adoption of the comparative negligence principle. Rea v. Leadership Housing, Inc., 312 So.2d 818 (Fla.App.1975). Accordingly, the judgment entered in favor of appel-lees, Larry Frady Crane Service and Reliance Insurance Company, is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.'

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Co., 328 So. 2d 868, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13990 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

328 So. 2d 868 (Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rea v. Leadership Housing, Inc.
312 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)