Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 23, 2015
Docket05-14-00786-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State (Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 23, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00786-CR

TRAMETRIA DENISE BALDWIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-52087-P

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck

Trametria Denise Baldwin appeals her conviction, following the adjudication of her guilt,

for robbery. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.02(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed

punishment at eight years’ imprisonment. In three issues, appellant contends the trial court’s

judgment adjudicating guilt should be modified to show there was no plea bargain agreement and

to reflect the correct names of the prosecutor and defense attorney at the adjudicating hearing.

We modify the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.

The judgment adjudicating guilt recites plea bargain terms as “8 years penitentiary.” The

record, however, shows appellant pleaded true to the motion to adjudicate without the benefit of a plea bargain. Additionally, the judgment incorrectly identifies the attorney for the State as

Jerry Varney and the attorney for appellant as Laura Barzune. The record shows that Meredith

Behgooy represented the State and Harry Ingram represent appellant at the adjudication hearing.

Thus, the judgment is incorrect. We sustain appellant’s three issues.

We modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to show (1) the attorney for the State is

“Meredith Behgooy;” (2) the attorney for defendant is “Harry Ingram;” and (3) to delete “8 years

Penitentiary” from the “terms of plea bargain” section. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v.

State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30

(Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

/David Schenck/ DAVID SCHENCK JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140786F.U05

-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TRAMETRIA DENISE BALDWIN, Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-52087-P. No. 05-14-00786-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Lang and Stoddart participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Meredith Behgooy.”

The section entitled “Attorney for Defendant” is modified to show “Harry Ingram.”

Delete “8 Years Penitentiary” from section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered February 23, 2015.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Asberry v. State
813 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Bigley v. State
865 S.W.2d 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trametria-denise-baldwin-v-state-texapp-2015.