Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State
This text of Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State (Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 23, 2015.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00786-CR
TRAMETRIA DENISE BALDWIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-52087-P
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Stoddart, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck
Trametria Denise Baldwin appeals her conviction, following the adjudication of her guilt,
for robbery. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.02(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed
punishment at eight years’ imprisonment. In three issues, appellant contends the trial court’s
judgment adjudicating guilt should be modified to show there was no plea bargain agreement and
to reflect the correct names of the prosecutor and defense attorney at the adjudicating hearing.
We modify the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.
The judgment adjudicating guilt recites plea bargain terms as “8 years penitentiary.” The
record, however, shows appellant pleaded true to the motion to adjudicate without the benefit of a plea bargain. Additionally, the judgment incorrectly identifies the attorney for the State as
Jerry Varney and the attorney for appellant as Laura Barzune. The record shows that Meredith
Behgooy represented the State and Harry Ingram represent appellant at the adjudication hearing.
Thus, the judgment is incorrect. We sustain appellant’s three issues.
We modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to show (1) the attorney for the State is
“Meredith Behgooy;” (2) the attorney for defendant is “Harry Ingram;” and (3) to delete “8 years
Penitentiary” from the “terms of plea bargain” section. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v.
State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30
(Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).
As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
/David Schenck/ DAVID SCHENCK JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47
140786F.U05
-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
TRAMETRIA DENISE BALDWIN, Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-52087-P. No. 05-14-00786-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Lang and Stoddart participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows:
The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Meredith Behgooy.”
The section entitled “Attorney for Defendant” is modified to show “Harry Ingram.”
Delete “8 Years Penitentiary” from section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered February 23, 2015.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trametria Denise Baldwin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trametria-denise-baldwin-v-state-texapp-2015.