Tramco Industries, Inc. v. Broad Hollow Associates
This text of 30 A.D.2d 522 (Tramco Industries, Inc. v. Broad Hollow Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, entered February 7, 1968, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-appellant, and the motion granted. Parol evidence is admissible to resolve an ambiguity, not to create one. The tax clause is clear both in its language and its application. Its interpretation is a question of law for the court. The year 1966/67 was the “first year after the full assessed value * * * has been determined”. (Tobin v. Union News Co., 18 A D 2d 243, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1155.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McGivern and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 522, 290 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tramco-industries-inc-v-broad-hollow-associates-nyappdiv-1968.