Tramco Industries, Inc. v. Broad Hollow Associates

30 A.D.2d 522, 290 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1968·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, entered February 7, 1968, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-appellant, and the motion granted. Parol evidence is admissible to resolve an ambiguity, not to create one. The tax clause is clear both in its language and its application. Its interpretation is a question of law for the court. The year 1966/67 was the “first year after the full assessed value * * * has been determined”. (Tobin v. Union News Co., 18 A D 2d 243, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1155.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McGivern and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tramco Industries, Inc. v. Broad Hollow Associates, 30 A.D.2d 522, 290 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 522 (Tramco Industries, Inc. v. Broad Hollow Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re L & v. Realty Corp.
76 B.R. 35 (E.D. New York, 1987)
Baldt Corp. v. Tabet Manufacturing Co.
412 F. Supp. 249 (S.D. New York, 1974)