Tramble v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tramble v. State

499 S.W.3d 387, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2016 WL 5387795

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 27, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103709

StatusPublished

This text of 499 S.W.3d 387 (Tramble v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tramble v. State, 499 S.W.3d 387, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2016 WL 5387795 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Tramble (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Tramble (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 S.W.3d 387, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2016 WL 5387795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tramble-v-state-moctapp-2016.