Trala v. Calloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trala v. Calloway

269 A.D.2d 806, 703 N.Y.S.2d 421, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2000

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 806 (Trala v. Calloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trala v. Calloway, 269 A.D.2d 806, 703 N.Y.S.2d 421, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the jury verdict does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, Supreme Court properly determined the present value of future damages in excess of $250,000 as of the date of the jury verdict and awarded interest on the present value of the excess future [807]*807damages as of the date of the determination of liability (see generally, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 84 NY2d 60). (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Negligence.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the jury verdict does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, Supreme Court properly determined the present value of future damages in excess of $250,000 as of the date of the jury verdict and awarded interest on the present value of the excess future [807]*807damages as of the date of the determination of liability (see generally, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 84 NY2d 60). (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Negligence.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 806, 703 N.Y.S.2d 421, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trala-v-calloway-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack