Traitell v. Livingston

269 A.D. 997, 59 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4966
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover commissions over and above salary actually paid and received, an affirmative defense alleges that the sum sued for represents an increase in earnings, the payment of which without approval of Federal agencies is violative of the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.), as amended, and as supplemented by Executive Orders and departmental regulations. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Traitell v. Livingston, 269 A.D. 997, 59 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 997 (Traitell v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morford v. Bellanca Aircraft Corp.
67 A.2d 542 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1949)
Clark v. Hinzmann
185 Misc. 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)