Traitel Bros. v. United States

131 F. 994, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4971
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJune 1, 1904
DocketNo. 3,264
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 F. 994 (Traitel Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Traitel Bros. v. United States, 131 F. 994, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4971 (circtsdny 1904).

Opinion

TOWNSEND,, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question comprises Welsh quarries, s.o,called, which were assessed for duty by the collector at the rate of four cents per square foot, under the pro[995]*995visions of paragraph 88 of Tariff Act July 24,1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 155 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1632], as “tiles, plain, unglazed, one color, exceeding two square inches in size.” The importers protested, claiming said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of 25 per cent, ad valorem, under the provisions of paragraph 87 of said act, as “brick other than fire brick, not glazed, enameled, painted, vitrified, ornamented or decorated in any manner.” The Board of Appraisers found that the merchandise is a species of tile known as “quarry tile,” and accordingly overruled the protest. This decision appears to be based upon evidence taken in another case, and which is not a part of the record herein. It appears from the evidence herein that the merchandise passed upon in said case was of a different character from that which was before the board on the present protest. The evidence herein does not justify the finding of the board. It appears from the great weight of evidence that quarries are unlike tiles, and in material, quality, texture, and the use to which they may be applied closely resemble brick. They should therefore have been classified by similitude, under the provisions of paragraph 87, for “brick, other than fire brick,” etc.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waddell & Co. v. United States
5 Ct. Cust. 63 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 F. 994, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traitel-bros-v-united-states-circtsdny-1904.