Home/Supreme Court/Trainer Wortham & Co. v. Betz

Trainer Wortham & Co. v. Betz

176 L. Ed. 2d 920, 130 S. Ct. 2400, 559 U.S. 1103, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3749, 78 U.S.L.W. 3642
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 3, 2010
DocketNo. 07-1489
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 L. Ed. 2d 920 (Trainer Wortham & Co. v. Betz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trainer Wortham & Co. v. Betz, 176 L. Ed. 2d 920, 130 S. Ct. 2400, 559 U.S. 1103, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3749, 78 U.S.L.W. 3642 (U.S. 2010).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ to certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Merck & Co. v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633, 130 S. Ct. 1784, 176 L. Ed. 2d 582 (2010).

Same case below, 519 F.3d 863.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co.
829 F. Supp. 2d 860 (N.D. California, 2011)
Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.
610 F.3d 1169 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 L. Ed. 2d 920, 130 S. Ct. 2400, 559 U.S. 1103, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3749, 78 U.S.L.W. 3642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trainer-wortham-co-v-betz-scotus-2010.