Trainer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Trainer v. State

110 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 698

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1926·No. 1 Div. 658.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for distilling, etc., alcoholic or spirituous liquors, and, for the unlawful possession of a still to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken. The cause is here submitted upon the record proper. This appears to be regular in all things, no error being apparent thereon. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court, from which this appeal is taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for distilling, etc., alcoholic or spirituous liquors, and, for the unlawful possession of a still to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken. The cause is here submitted upon the record proper. This appears to be regular in all things, no error being apparent thereon. The judgment of conviction in the circuit court, from which this appeal is taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Trainer v. State, 110 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

110 So. 926 (Trainer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.