Trahant v. 82 Horatio Owners, Ltd.
This text of 82 A.D.3d 504 (Trahant v. 82 Horatio Owners, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ summary judgment motions to dismiss this personal injury action where triable issues of material fact remain as to which defendants owed a duty of care, and, as to whether plaintiff provided prior notice of the dangerous condition that resulted in the underlying accident and injury (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.D.3d 504, 918 N.Y.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trahant-v-82-horatio-owners-ltd-nyappdiv-2011.