Trag v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trag v. Frank

110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48530

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.2d 631 (Trag v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trag v. Frank, 110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition due to petitioner’s failure to answer interrogatories within the time period provided for. The best interest of the children, which is of paramount concern in support proceedings, can only be served by permitting petitioner additional time within which to file her sworn answers. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition due to petitioner’s failure to answer interrogatories within the time period provided for. The best interest of the children, which is of paramount concern in support proceedings, can only be served by permitting petitioner additional time within which to file her sworn answers. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trag-v-frank-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack