Trag v. Frank
110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48530
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition due to petitioner’s failure to answer interrogatories within the time period provided for. The best interest of the children, which is of paramount concern in support proceedings, can only be served by permitting petitioner additional time within which to file her sworn answers. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trag v. Frank, 110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 631 (Trag v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Solly M. v. Audrey S.
32 Misc. 3d 541 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)