Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction
719 A.2d 1232, 48 Conn. App. 909, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 158
Opinion
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petitioner certification to appeal. We find that the petitioner did not meet his burden of showing that there was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice was done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Stovall v. Commissioner of Correction, 43 Conn. App. 552, 684 A.2d 731 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 958, 688 A.2d 329 (1997).
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction, 719 A.2d 1232, 48 Conn. App. 909, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 158 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
719 A.2d 1232 (Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simms v. Warden, State Prison
646 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Stovall v. Commissioner of Correction
684 A.2d 731 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)