Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction

Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction

719 A.2d 1232, 48 Conn. App. 909, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 158
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1998
DocketAC 16947
StatusPublished

This text of 719 A.2d 1232 (Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Traficonda v. Commissioner of Correction, 719 A.2d 1232, 48 Conn. App. 909, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 158 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petitioner certification to appeal. We find that the petitioner did not meet his burden of showing that there was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice was done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Stovall v. Commissioner of Correction, 43 Conn. App. 552, 684 A.2d 731 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 958, 688 A.2d 329 (1997).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simms v. Warden, State Prison
646 A.2d 126 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Stovall v. Commissioner of Correction
684 A.2d 731 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 A.2d 1232, 48 Conn. App. 909, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traficonda-v-commissioner-of-correction-connappct-1998.