Traendly v. State

373 N.E.2d 289, 43 N.Y.2d 804, 402 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2583
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1977·No. Claim 52303; Claim 50821·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, with costs. We note, however, that the only issue decided on this appeal is the allocation of the award owed by the State to tenant and landlord. The parties had an opportunity to litigate this issue, and we find no error in the disposition of that issue. We do not determine the rights and obligations of the landlord and the tenant, as prescribed in subdivision (c) of paragraph 26 of the lease with respect to the application of the proceeds of the award.

*806 Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Breitel taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Traendly v. State, 373 N.E.2d 289, 43 N.Y.2d 804, 402 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2583 (N.Y. 1977).

373 N.E.2d 289 (Traendly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mazur Bros. Realty, LLC v. State
23 Misc. 3d 346 (New York State Court of Claims, 2008)
Castellano v. State
374 N.E.2d 618 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)