Traders National Bank v. Huttig Manufacturing Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Traders National Bank v. Huttig Manufacturing Co.

55 So. 928, 1 Ala. App. 452, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 278

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 So. 928 (Traders National Bank v. Huttig Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Traders National Bank v. Huttig Manufacturing Co., 55 So. 928, 1 Ala. App. 452, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 278 (Ala. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The propositions advanced in behalf of the appellant must be disposed of adversely to it on the authority of the ruling made in the case of People’s Sawings Bank & Trust Co. v. Huttig Manufacturing Co., supra, 55 South. 929. The present case is not differentiated in principle from the case referred to by the fact, disclosed in this case, that, on the payment of the note to the appellant, which was secured by the wrongfully obtained warehouse receipts representing the appellee’s property, the warehouse receipts were by the appellant, at the request of the maker of the note, turn[456]*456ed over to third persons, who were strangers to the appellee. That act did not obliterate the conversion which was consummated by the unauthorized hypothecation to the appellant. Indeed, that act itself would have amounted to a conversion of the appellee’s property, without regard to what had gone before.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, P. J.

The propositions advanced in behalf of the appellant must be disposed of adversely to it on the authority of the ruling made in the case of People’s Sawings Bank & Trust Co. v. Huttig Manufacturing Co., supra, 55 South. 929. The present case is not differentiated in principle from the case referred to by the fact, disclosed in this case, that, on the payment of the note to the appellant, which was secured by the wrongfully obtained warehouse receipts representing the appellee’s property, the warehouse receipts were by the appellant, at the request of the maker of the note, turn[456]*456ed over to third persons, who were strangers to the appellee. That act did not obliterate the conversion which was consummated by the unauthorized hypothecation to the appellant. Indeed, that act itself would have amounted to a conversion of the appellee’s property, without regard to what had gone before.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 So. 928, 1 Ala. App. 452, 1911 Ala. App. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traders-national-bank-v-huttig-manufacturing-co-alactapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack