Traders, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Traders, Inc. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 334

United States Customs Court·Decided December 8, 1955·No. No. 59528; protests 272054-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.

Traders, Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 334 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 334 (Traders, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related