Traders & General Insurance Company v. Wiley N. McClary
This text of 241 F.2d 462 (Traders & General Insurance Company v. Wiley N. McClary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plai tiff, injured when his truck skidded out f control on a road made slick by oil sp led from another truck, turned over, a d rolled down an embankment. The o ly contentions on appeal are: (1) that the evidence was not sufficient to justif the jury's finding that the oil was spiled by appellant's assured; and (2) th4tt the verdict was excessive. Both cont~ntions, purely factual, are so clearly `~,ithout foundatiQn on the present recor4 as to call for no discussion. We are 1ot~ however, satisfied that the appeal w~s "sued out merely for delay" so as tol call for the award of damages under P~ragraph 2 of Rule 30 of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A.
The judgment is tl~ierefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 F.2d 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traders-general-insurance-company-v-wiley-n-mcclary-ca5-1957.