Tracy v. Trotter

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedSeptember 4, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00288
StatusUnknown

This text of Tracy v. Trotter (Tracy v. Trotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy v. Trotter, (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 Katherine F. Parks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6227 2 Thorndal Armstrong, PC 6590 S. McCarran Blvd., Suite B 3 Reno, Nevada 89509 Tel: (775) 786-2882 4 kfp@thorndal.com Attorney for Defendants 5 CHURCHILL COUNTY JUSTICE OF THE PEACE BENJAMIN TROTTER and CHURCHILL COUNTY 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 SARAH TRACY, an individual, 12 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:24-cv-00288-ART-CSD 13 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 CHURCHILL COUNTY JUSTICE OF THE PEACE BENJAMIN TROTTER; and 15 CHURCHILL COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, 16 Defendants. 17 18 In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties 19 in connection with this case, the parties hereby agree as follows: 20 1. Any party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant 21 page or otherwise as set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or 22 non-party considers in good faith to contain confidential information, subject to protection under 23 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or state or federal law (“Confidential Information”). 24 Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on 25 which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 26 2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or 27 in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or a party or 28 non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of said responses or of 1 the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the 2 transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any other party 3 may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall 4 follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to 5 the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be 6 treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures 7 described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all 8 previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the 9 specific designation. 10 3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than 11 information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the 12 information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 13 4. Except with the prior written consent of other parties and the non-party providing 14 the Confidential Information, if applicable, or upon the prior order of this Court obtained upon 15 notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other 16 than: 17 (a) counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in-house counsel and 18 co-counsel retained for this litigation; 19 (b) employees of such counsel; 20 (c) individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the 21 extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; 22 (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this 23 litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this 24 Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the 25 Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the 26 pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of 27 the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; 28 (e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 1 (f) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 2 (g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A witness shall sign 3 the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be 4 disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party 5 who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that 6 Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. 7 Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 8 5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 9 information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set 10 forth herein. 11 6. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with 12 the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those 13 documents under seal, and shall be filed consistent with the court’s electronic filing procedures 14 in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the 15 party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor 16 of public access to papers filed in court. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 17 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2010), and 18 Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016). 19 7. A party may designate as “Confidential” documents or discovery materials 20 produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document 21 numbers of other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or 22 discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without 23 restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as confidential, although a 24 document may lose its confidential status if it is made public. 25 8. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such 26 party may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the material. 27 The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-five (25) days from the 28 receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material as 1 confidential. The party or non-party seeking the order has the burden of establishing that the 2 document is entitled to protection. 3 9. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential 4 Information, all documents shall be treated as such and shall be subject to the provisions hereof 5 unless and until one of the following occurs: 6 (a) the party or non-party claims that the material is Confidential Information 7 withdraws such designation in writing; or 8 (b) the party or non-party who claims that the material is Confidential Information 9 fails to apply to the Court for an order designating the material confidential within the time 10 period specified above after receipt of a written challenge to such designation; or 11 (c) the Court rules the material is not confidential. 12 10. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential 13 Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise 14 agreed or ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracy v. Trotter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-trotter-nvd-2024.