Tracy v. Preble
This text of 117 Mass. 4 (Tracy v. Preble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mitchell, for whose benefit this action is prosecuted against the defendants as sureties on the official bond of one Roberts, a constable of the city, had, before the commencement of this suit, obtained judgment against Roberts alone for the same wrongful official act. Upon this judgment an execution was issued, upon which Roberts was arrested and entered into a poor debtor’s recognizance. He made default upon this recognizance, and, upon the return of the execution unsatisfied, Mitchell brought an action upon it, which is still pending.
The court ruled, against the defendants’ request, that the arrest of Roberts, his default, and the pendency of the suit on the recognizance, were no bar to this suit upon his official bond, and this ruling was right.
The commitment of a judgment debtor on execution was a satisfaction of the judgment at common law. It is not so where the debtor is discharged from arrest by giving recognizance under our statutes. Gen. Sts. e. 124, § 22. The right to proceed against other parties who stand in the relation of sureties for the same debt is not defeated except by the actual payment of the judgment, and the creditor may proceed against different parties at the same time until that result is reached. Murray v. Shearer, 7 Cush. 333. Moore v. Loring, 106 Mass. 455.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 Mass. 4, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-preble-mass-1875.