Tracy v. New York Magazine Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tracy v. New York Magazine Co.

50 A.D.2d 775, 376 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 775 (Tracy v. New York Magazine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tracy v. New York Magazine Co., 50 A.D.2d 775, 376 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 9, 1975, denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the complaint as to the defendants Alan J. Patricof, Jack Nessel, Aaron Latham, Nancy New-house, Dorothy Seiberling and Elizabeth Smith Crow, and otherwise affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion by John C. Leonforte at Trial Term, without costs and without disbursements. In this defamation action, the motion for summary judgment is granted as to those defendants above named because their sworn statement that they were not in any way involved with the article in question is uncontroverted. The plaintiff seems to have taken the names of these defendants from the masthead of New York Magazine although they were not otherwise involved. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 9, 1975, denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the complaint as to the defendants Alan J. Patricof, Jack Nessel, Aaron Latham, Nancy New-house, Dorothy Seiberling and Elizabeth Smith Crow, and otherwise affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion by John C. Leonforte at Trial Term, without costs and without disbursements. In this defamation action, the motion for summary judgment is granted as to those defendants above named because their sworn statement that they were not in any way involved with the article in question is uncontroverted. The plaintiff seems to have taken the names of these defendants from the masthead of New York Magazine although they were not otherwise involved. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 775, 376 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-new-york-magazine-co-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack