Tracy v. McGarty

12 R.I. 168, 1878 R.I. LEXIS 53
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 16, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 12 R.I. 168 (Tracy v. McGarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy v. McGarty, 12 R.I. 168, 1878 R.I. LEXIS 53 (R.I. 1878).

Opinion

Dtmfee, O. J.

We think the exceptions must be sustained and a new trial granted. The assignment preceded the garnishment, and the garnishee, though he had no notice of the assignment before filing his affidavit, did have, as we infer, notice of it in season to ask leave of the court, which doubtless would have been granted, to modify his affidavit so as to make it conform to the facts. Drake on Attachment, § 650. This he ought to have done, and fortunately it is not too late for him to do it, even now, judgment having been deferred. The rule is discussed and settled for this State in Northam v. Cartright, 10 R. I. 19; see also Noble v. Smith, 6 R. I. 446; Drake on Attachment, § 527. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 R.I. 168, 1878 R.I. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-mcgarty-ri-1878.