Tracy v. Holcombe
65 U.S. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742, 24 How. 426, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case has been brought here by a writ of error directed to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. But upon looking into the transcript, it appears that the judgment which it is proposed to revise is a judgment reversing the decision of the court below, and awarding a new trial. There is, therefore, no final judgment in the case, and the writ must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tracy v. Holcombe, 65 U.S. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742, 24 How. 426, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423 (1861).
65 U.S. 426 (Tracy v. Holcombe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Grazia v. Anderson
58 A.2d 306 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1948)
Ft. Dodge Portland Cement Corp. v. Monk
276 F. 113 (Eighth Circuit, 1921)
United States v. Beatty
232 U.S. 463 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Clement v. Wilson
135 F. 749 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Morgan v. Thompson
124 F. 203 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)