Tracy v. Holcombe

Supreme Court

Tracy v. Holcombe

65 U.S. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742, 24 How. 426, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 14, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 65 U.S. 426 (Tracy v. Holcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tracy v. Holcombe, 65 U.S. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742, 24 How. 426, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423 (1861).

Pincite

Opinion

*427 Mr. Chief Justice TANEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case has been brought here by a writ of error directed to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. But upon looking into the transcript, it appears that the judgment which it is proposed to revise is a judgment reversing the decision of the court below, and awarding a new trial. There is, therefore, no final judgment in the case, and the writ must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*427 Mr. Chief Justice TANEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case has been brought here by a writ of error directed to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. But upon looking into the transcript, it appears that the judgment which it is proposed to revise is a judgment reversing the decision of the court below, and awarding a new trial. There is, therefore, no final judgment in the case, and the writ must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 U.S. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742, 24 How. 426, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-holcombe-scotus-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack