Tracy v. Froment

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tracy v. Froment

172 A.D. 947, 157 N.Y.S. 1147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 947 (Tracy v. Froment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tracy v. Froment, 172 A.D. 947, 157 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion that the complaint sets forth a cause of action with sufficient definiteness and certainty. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and -the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion that the complaint sets forth a cause of action with sufficient definiteness and certainty. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and -the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 947, 157 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-froment-nyappdiv-1916.