Tracy v. Dennis

1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772, 45 Okla. 208, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 5, 1915
Docket6547
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1915 OK 4 (Tracy v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy v. Dennis, 1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772, 45 Okla. 208, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 259 (Okla. 1915).

Opinion

RIDDLE, J.

Motion is filed to- dismiss this appeal, on the ground that no notice was given of the time and place of allow *209 ing and settling tbe ease-xnade, and that same was allowed and settled without notice to defendant in error; that defendant in error made no appearance or suggestion of amendments, nor did he otherwise waive notice or a right to be present at the time said case-made was settled. Plaintiffs in error concede the existence of this state of facts. The motion to dismiss is sustained. Moore v. Howard Mer. Co., 40 Okla. 491, 139 Pac. 524.

Wyant v. Wheeler, 38 Okla. 68, 132 Pac. 137.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langley v. Albert
1929 OK 275 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris
1923 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hubbard v. Meek
160 P. 1128 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Going
1915 OK 522 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772, 45 Okla. 208, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-v-dennis-okla-1915.