Tracy v. Dennis

1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772, 45 Okla. 208, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 259
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 5, 1915·No. 6547·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

RIDDLE, J.

Motion is filed to- dismiss this appeal, on the ground that no notice was given of the time and place of allow *209 ing and settling tbe ease-xnade, and that same was allowed and settled without notice to defendant in error; that defendant in error made no appearance or suggestion of amendments, nor did he otherwise waive notice or a right to be present at the time said case-made was settled. Plaintiffs in error concede the existence of this state of facts. The motion to dismiss is sustained. Moore v. Howard Mer. Co., 40 Okla. 491, 139 Pac. 524.

Wyant v. Wheeler, 38 Okla. 68, 132 Pac. 137.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tracy v. Dennis, 1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772, 45 Okla. 208, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 259 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 4 (Tracy v. Dennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langley v. Albert
1929 OK 275 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris
1923 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hubbard v. Meek
160 P. 1128 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Going
1915 OK 522 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)