Tracy Ray Hass v. State
This text of Tracy Ray Hass v. State (Tracy Ray Hass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 12-14-00189-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/4/2015 9:13:50 AM CATHY LUSK CLERK
NO. 12-14-00189-CR
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE TYLER, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS 3/4/2015 9:13:50 AM 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CATHY S. LUSK Clerk TYLER, TEXAS
TRACY RAY HASS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER 061728 FROM THE 59TH DISTRICT COURT OF GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS HON. RAYBURN NALL, presiding
STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE'S BRIEF
THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:
Now comes the State of Texas, by and through her attorney in the
above entitled and numbered cause, and files this Motion for Extension of
Time in which to file the Appellee's Brief, and would show the following:
I. Page 1 of 5 The appellant was convicted of Theft of $1,500 or more but less than
$20,000 and Burglary of a Building on March 19, 2014. After the jury found
two enhancement paragraphs true, the appellant was sentenced to 10
years in prison on each count.
The appellant filed his brief on August 14, 2014. THE APPELLANT
DID NOT SERVE A COPY OF THE BRIEF ON THE STATE. Further, the
notice of electronic filing by this court went to the spam filter on our email
system. The State’s brief was due on September 15, 2014. This case is
set for submission on March 24, 2015.
II.
The State now makes her first request for an extension of time in
which to file the State’s Brief.
III.
The facts relied upon to reasonably explain the need for an extension
of time are as follows:
Page 2 of 5 1. This attorney is the sole attorney responsible for post-
conviction litigation in the Grayson County Criminal District
Attorney’s office. The case was tried by an attorney/attorneys
other that this attorney.
2. THE APPELLANT FAILED TO SERVE A COPY OF THE
BRIEF ON THE STATE. The electronic notice sent by this
court to let us know that the appellant’s brief had been efiled
was sent to the spam filter for our email system. THE STATE
WAS UNAWARE OF IT’S DEADLINE TO FILE THE STATE’S
BRIEF IN THIS CASE UNTIL NOTICE OF SUBMISSION WAS
EMAILED TO OUR OFFICE ON MARCH 4, 2015.
Wherefore, premises considered, the State requests this motion
for extension of time be granted and that the Court extend the time for the
filing of the State’s Brief to MARCH 20, 2015.
/s/ _______________ ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE
KARLA BAUGH HACKETT ASST. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS 200 S. CROCKETT SUITE 100
Page 3 of 5 SHERMAN, TEXAS 75090 903/ 813-4361 903/ 892-9933 (FAX) STATE BAR NO. 01923400
Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE'S BRIEF has this day been
delivered to the attorney for the Appellant, in accordance with the laws of
the State of Texas.
SIGNED MARCH 4, 2015.
/s/ _______________ ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE KARLA BAUGH HACKETT ASST. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS
Page 5 of 5
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tracy Ray Hass v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-ray-hass-v-state-texapp-2015.