Tracy Ray Gibson v. State
This text of Tracy Ray Gibson v. State (Tracy Ray Gibson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOS. 12-17-00146-CR 12-17-00147-CR 12-17-00148-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
TRACY RAY GIBSON, § APPEALS FROM THE 145TH APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM In 2007, Tracy Ray Gibson pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, possession of a firearm by a felon, and theft. See Gibson v. State, Nos. 12-12-00403-CR, 12-12-00404-CR, 12-12- 00405-CR, 2012 WL 6030752 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). He appealed the convictions, but because the appeals were untimely, this Court dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. The court of criminal appeals subsequently granted Appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Gibson, No. WR- 68,962-01, 2016 WL 8715906 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 13, 2016) (not designated for publication). Thereafter, Appellant reached a new plea agreement and the trial court imposed sentence on April 5, 2016. Appellant untimely appealed; thus, this Court again dismissed the appeals for want of jurisdiction in October 2016. See Gibson v. State, Nos. 12-16-00267-CR, 12-16-00268- CR, 12-16-00269-CR, 2016 WL 5930157 (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 12, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Our mandate issued on March 13, 2017, after which Appellant again filed a notice of appeal in all three trial court cause numbers. On May 12, 2017, this Court notified Appellant that his notice of appeal in the three cases failed to show the jurisdiction of this Court, i.e., there is no new final judgment or appealable order contained therein. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1, 26.2(a)(1), 51.2. We further notified Appellant that the appeals would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before June 12 to show the jurisdiction of this Court. On May 22, Appellant responded that (1) the court of criminal appeals granted him a new trial in January 2016, (2) he reached a new plea agreement, and (3) he is entitled to appeal from the 2016 judgment. Appellant has already appealed from the 2016 judgment and, as previously stated, we dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the appeals were untimely filed. See Gibson, 2016 WL 5930157. Appellant’s notice of appeal indicates his belief that his conviction was not final until our mandate issued on March 13, 2017. However, the rules of appellate procedure required Appellant to file his notice of appeal within thirty days after sentence is imposed or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). This he did not do. See id.; see also Gibson, 2016 WL 5930157. Once this Court’s mandate issued and was received by the trial court clerk, it must be enforced. See TEX. R. APP. P. 51.2. Further review rests with the court of criminal appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.1; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered May 31, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
2 COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
MAY 31, 2017
NO. 12-17-00146-CR
TRACY RAY GIBSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Appeal from the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14962-2007)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS
NO. 12-17-00147-CR
Appeal from the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14963-2007)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J. COURT OF APPEALS
NO. 12-17-00148-CR
Appeal from the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14964-2007)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tracy Ray Gibson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-ray-gibson-v-state-texapp-2017.