Tracy Preston v. APCH
This text of Tracy Preston v. APCH (Tracy Preston v. APCH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 35 SSM 31 Tracy Preston, &c., Appellant, v. APCH, Inc. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Submitted by William W. Pulos, for appellant. Submitted by Jill L. Yonkers, for respondents.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. Decedent’s work as a welder during the “normal manufacturing process” of fabricating rotor components for air preheaters did not involve “erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or pointing” of a building or structure (Jock v Fien, 80 NY2d 965, 968 [1992]; Labor Law § 240 [1]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Judge Fahey took no part.
Decided February 13, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tracy Preston v. APCH, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-preston-v-apch-ny-2020.