Tracy M. Barnes v. Ethan Allen, Inc.
This text of 149 F. App'x 845 (Tracy M. Barnes v. Ethan Allen, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tracy M. Barnes appeals the judgment of the district court, arguing that it was error for the court to grant Ethan Allen, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We agree with the district court that the doctor’s note provided to Barnes on January 14, 2004, does not qualify as a proper “fitness-for-duty certificate” under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) regulations. See 29 C.F.R. § 825.311.
Barnes’s brief, construed liberally, arguably contends that Ethan Allen waived any right to a fitness-for-duty certificate. Implicit in this argument is a contention that Barnes could have furnished such a certificate if asked. The record, however, refutes this contention. The letter from Dr. Marchi submitted to Ethan Allen on March 23, 2004, states that Barnes was incapacitated and unable to work until March 23, 2004 — a date well beyond the expiration of her twelve weeks of FMLA leave.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 F. App'x 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-m-barnes-v-ethan-allen-inc-ca11-2005.