Tracy Haynes, Sr. v. Bank of America

444 F. App'x 966

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: July 25, 2011
• Docket: 09-56803
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tracy A. Haynes, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir.1986). We affirm.

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on November 4, 2009 dismissing Haynes’s second amended complaint.

Haynes’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider Haynes’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1223 (9th Cir.2007).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.