Tracy Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
Docket19-40975
StatusUnpublished

This text of Tracy Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director (Tracy Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director, (5th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 19-40975 Document: 00515272482 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 19-40975 January 15, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce TRACY RAY GIBSON, Clerk

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:17-CV-188

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SOUTHWICK, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM*: This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion if necessary. Hill v. City of Seven Points, 230 F.3d 167, 169 (5th Cir. 2000). In this habeas corpus case filed by a state prisoner, the petitioner filed a notice of appeal from the magistrate judge=s report and recommendation to deny the petition.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-40975 Document: 00515272482 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2020

No. 19-40975 “Federal appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) a final decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291; (2) a decision that is deemed final due to jurisprudential exception or that has been properly certified as final pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall into specific classes, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), or that have been properly certified for appeal by the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).” Askanase v. Livingwell, Inc., 981 F.2d 807, 809-10 (5th Cir. 1993). The report and recommendation of a magistrate judge is not a final order and it does not fall into any of the other categories that would make it appealable. See United States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1998). Moreover, although the district court subsequently adopted the report and recommendation, the present notice of appeal is not effective for purposes of appealing that judgment. Id. at 962 (A[T]he recommendation of a magistrate judge is not a final decision and does not in any way dispose of a party’s claims.@). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracy Gibson v. Lorie Davis, Director, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-gibson-v-lorie-davis-director-ca5-2020.