Tracy Buchanan v. City of Little Rock

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 1999
Docket98-3225
StatusUnpublished

This text of Tracy Buchanan v. City of Little Rock (Tracy Buchanan v. City of Little Rock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy Buchanan v. City of Little Rock, (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 98-3225 ___________

Tracy Buchanan, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Little Rock; Officer Sturdivant, * District Court for the #13173, Little Rock Police Department; * Eastern District of Arkansas. Officer Jackson, #14962, Little Rock * Police Department, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: June 1, 1999 Filed: June 21, 1999 ___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Tracy Buchanan appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Little Rock police officer Laurel Sturdivant in her individual capacity. We remanded to the district court for it to determine whether

1 The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Buchanan’s untimely third amended complaint adding Sturdivant related back to his timely-filed original complaint. See Buchanan v. City of Little Rock, No. 96-3326, 1997 WL 78518 (8th Cir. Feb. 26, 1997) (unpublished per curiam). The district court found that the complaint did not relate back to the original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c). After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude dismissal was proper as Buchanan did not demonstrate circumstances that would support a conclusion that the amended complaint related back. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracy Buchanan v. City of Little Rock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-buchanan-v-city-of-little-rock-ca8-1999.