Tracie Eudaley v. Paul Hopkins

Eighth Circuit

Tracie Eudaley v. Paul Hopkins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 23, 2025

Docket24-2764

StatusUnpublished

This text of Tracie Eudaley v. Paul Hopkins (Tracie Eudaley v. Paul Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tracie Eudaley v. Paul Hopkins, (8th Cir. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-2764 ___________________________

Tracie Eudaley

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Paul Hopkins, Medical Center Director; Ryan Wells; Ashley Lepold; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Angela Smith; Ryan Maddox; Brenda Norden

Defendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________

Submitted: April 18, 2025 Filed: April 23, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Tracie Eudaley, a former employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se Federal Tort

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Claims Act and civil rights action against the VA and multiple employees thereof. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Coons v. Mineta, 410 F.3d 1036, 1039 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI