Tracey Youngblood-McDaniel and Endpoint Capital, LLC v. Diagnostic Bioscience Laboratories, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedDecember 2, 2025
Docket8:24-cv-00700
StatusUnknown

This text of Tracey Youngblood-McDaniel and Endpoint Capital, LLC v. Diagnostic Bioscience Laboratories, LLC (Tracey Youngblood-McDaniel and Endpoint Capital, LLC v. Diagnostic Bioscience Laboratories, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracey Youngblood-McDaniel and Endpoint Capital, LLC v. Diagnostic Bioscience Laboratories, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

TRACEY YOUNGBLOOD-MCDANIEL AND ENDPOINT CAPITAL, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 8:24-cv-700-TPB-LSG

DIAGNOSTIC BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, LLC,

Defendant. ____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Lindsay S. Griffin, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on October 17, 2025. (Doc. 50). Judge Griffin recommends that Plaintiffs’ “Amended Motion to Supplement Judgment” and “Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment” (Docs. 33; 48) be denied. No party has objected, and the time to object has expired. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the

Page 1 of 3 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo

determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982). Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Griffin’s well-

reasoned report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 50) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.

Page 2 of 3 (2) Plaintiffs’ “Amended Motion to Supplement Judgment” and “Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Default Judgment” (Docs. 33; 48) are DENIED as set forth in the report and recommendation. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 2.4 day of December, 2025.

TOM BARBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 3 of 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracey Youngblood-McDaniel and Endpoint Capital, LLC v. Diagnostic Bioscience Laboratories, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracey-youngblood-mcdaniel-and-endpoint-capital-llc-v-diagnostic-flmd-2025.