Tracey v. Chicago Railway Co.

185 Ill. App. 125, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 983
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided February 3, 1914·No. Gen. No. 18,955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Street railroads, § 142*—instruction on facts constituting negligence. Where there was a conflict in the evidence as to the distance of a street car from a wagon at the time the driver of the latter attempted to cross the track, an instruction that: “It is negligence for a motorman in charge of a street car to run said car at such a rate of speed that he cannot stop said car within the distance at which he could, by the exercise of ordinary care on his part, see an obstruction ahead of him on the track,” is erroneous. 6. Street railroads, § 62*—mutual obligations as to use of streets. The driver of a wagon and the employes of a street rail-' way company operating a street car, using the street in common, are bound only to exercise ordinary care to avoid injuring each other.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tracey v. Chicago Railway Co., 185 Ill. App. 125, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 983 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

185 Ill. App. 125 (Tracey v. Chicago Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coukoulis v. Schwartz
17 N.E.2d 601 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1938)