Tracey Mackey v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 2017
Docket5D17-133
StatusPublished

This text of Tracey Mackey v. State (Tracey Mackey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracey Mackey v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TRACEY MACKEY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-133

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 9, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.

Tracey Mackey, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Tracey Mackey appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. The claims

raised in Mackey’s motion were facially insufficient. Rather than denying Mackey’s

motion, the trial court should have allowed him sixty days to amend his motion. See Fla.

R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely

filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the

defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”). We reverse the trial court’s summary denial order and remand for the trial court to

provide Mackey sixty days to amend his motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracey Mackey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracey-mackey-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.