Tracey Johnson v. City of Shelby, Mississip

588 F. App'x 371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tracey Johnson v. City of Shelby, Mississip. Read the opinion of the Court — 743 F.3d 59
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2014·No. 12-60735·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

Following the law of this circuit, we previously affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the City of Shelby on plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment due process claims on the ground that plaintiffs failed to invoke 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Johnson v. City of Shelby, Miss., 743 F.3d 59, 62 (5th Cir.2013). The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari and reversed our judgment, holding that a plaintiff need not expressly invoke Section 1983 to state a claim under the statute. Johnson v. City of Shelby, Miss., 574 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 346, 190 L.Ed.2d 309 (2014). Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s judgment and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tracey Johnson v. City of Shelby, Mississip, 588 F. App'x 371 (5th Cir. 2014).

588 F. App'x 371 (Tracey Johnson v. City of Shelby, Mississip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tracey Johnson v. City of Shelby, Mississip
743 F.3d 59 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Johnson v. City of Shelby
135 S. Ct. 346 (Supreme Court, 2014)