Tracey Harris Coomer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2009
Docket06-09-00136-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Tracey Harris Coomer v. State (Tracey Harris Coomer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracey Harris Coomer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-09-00136-CR
______________________________


TRACEY HARRIS COOMER, Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court
Upshur County, Texas
Trial Court No. 10,347





Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Tracey Harris Coomer filed pro se a notice of appeal July 2, 2009, "from the judgments of denial herein rendered against TRACEY HARRIS COOMER." We have contacted the district clerk's office, and they have informed us that there are no orders on file denying any requests from Coomer. (1)

A timely notice of appeal from a conviction or an appealable order is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect an appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Coomer's sentence was imposed July 15, 1991. No motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, the last date Coomer could timely file his notice of appeal from his sentence was August 14, 1991, thirty days after the day the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

This Court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, no pet.).

Coomer has failed to perfect his appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.



Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice



Date Submitted: July 30, 2009

Date Decided: July 31, 2009



Do Not Publish



1. Coomer sent a request to this Court requesting documents so that he may fill out an 11.07 writ, and we replied July 21, 2009, by letter with the following information: "11.07 writs are filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin. The district clerk is to provide you with the proper forms to submit to Austin. Enclosed is the 11.07 form off the Court of Criminal Appeal's website."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett v. State
91 S.W.3d 386 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracey Harris Coomer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracey-harris-coomer-v-state-texapp-2009.